Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0909

reference
24-tree-1
name
0909
tree-preservation-order

undefined

24-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.938300 50.854433)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.938258 50.854428,-0.938260 50.854437,-0.938266 50.854444,-0.938275 50.854450,-0.938287 50.854454,-0.938300 50.854456,-0.938313 50.854455,-0.938325 50.854451,-0.938335 50.854445,-0.938341 50.854438,-0.938343 50.854429,-0.938341 50.854421,-0.938335 50.854413,-0.938326 50.854407,-0.938314 50.854403,-0.938301 50.854402,-0.938288 50.854403,-0.938276 50.854407,-0.938266 50.854413,-0.938260 50.854420,-0.938258 50.854428)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL